Over 10 years we help companies reach their financial and branding goals. Engitech is a values-driven technology agency dedicated.

Gallery

Contacts

411 University St, Seattle, USA

[email protected]

+1 -800-456-478-23

Twitter Facebook-f Pinterest-p Instagram

AI Governance Framework: 8-Step Implementation Guide & Resources | Tech Jacks

AI Governance framework: from strategy to implementation

Welcome to your AI governance hub. We’re on a mission to build the most comprehensive resource for responsible AI innovation, and we’d love for you to grow alongside us. Think of this as your trusted guide, whether you’re a C-suite executive planning your organization’s AI strategy, a compliance officer grappling with ever-evolving regulations, or a technical leader figuring out how to implement governance frameworks that actually work.

We know it’s not always easy to navigate the complexities of AI. That’s why we’re focused on offering proven insights and practical tools that can help you stay ahead. From our foundational 8-step implementation framework to emerging regulatory analysis and real-world case studies, we’re here to help organizations of all sizes harness AI’s transformative potential while managing risks and meeting compliance requirements.

It’s a big vision, but one grounded in practicality: to turn AI governance into a competitive advantage for you. Because at the end of the day, responsible AI is about more than compliance. It’s about building trust, driving innovation, and shaping a future we can all feel good about.

So, where do you start? Right here.

Let’s tackle the challenges of AI governance together and turn them into opportunities for growth. The future of responsible AI is waiting. Are you ready?

8-Critical Stages of AI Governance

In our article: AI Governance: 8 Defined Stages to Mitigate Risks we discussed 8 phases that organizations can implement to establish a robust AI Governance Committee, tasked with providing AI governance over 64 sub-activities:

    1. Establish & Mandate Objectives

    2. Define the Committee’s Composition and Roles

    3. Develope Responsible AI Framework & Guidance ePrincipals (AI Bias, AI Acceptable Use Policy )

    4. Establish Risk Management & Compliance Processes

    5. Define Evaluation Criteria and Metrics for AI Systems and Governance (AI Use Case Inventories Tracker)

    6. Implement Audit and Monitoring Mechanisms

    7. Address Specific governance Elements

    8. Continous Improvement and Adaption

AI Governance, Committee Objectives

These phases establish the visibility and activities that are needed to reign in AI Governance for a Committee and ensure that the committe has comprehensive understanding of how AI is being managed and utilized within their organizations.

Articles & Guidance: AI Governance Planning - Strategy

Priority : AI Use Case Tracker

AI Governance Solutions by Role

C-Suite Executives

AI Leadership for the C-Suite: Navigating Governance in a Transformative Era

Boardroom conversations have shifted from “Should we adopt AI?” to “How do we use it responsibly while staying ahead?” As a C-suite leader, the pressure is real. While 78% of businesses use AI across functions, only 28% report active CEO involvement in shaping AI strategy. This leadership gap can lead to missed opportunities and underperformance.

McKinsey research shows companies with CEOs directly involved in AI governance achieve stronger EBIT results. Without solid frameworks, risks like regulatory breaches, operational breakdowns, and reputational harm increase significantly. The stakes couldn’t be higher.

Governing AI doesn’t have to feel overwhelming. Reframing AI governance as an enabler of innovation rather than a compliance burden can make all the difference. Clear frameworks and actionable roadmaps can help scale AI adoption, keep risks in check, and empower you to lead with confidence.

Whether building an AI governance council or scaling an enterprise strategy, it’s about asking the right questions and using the right tools. With the right approach, AI can drive transformation while protecting your organization. Let’s make that vision a reality.

Compliance Officers

You’ve probably seen this before. A shiny new tech comes along, promising to change everything, and compliance is left scrambling to figure out the risks nobody thought about. But AI? It’s different. It’s already here, embedded in how your organization works, whether you’re ready for it or not.

Think about it. Someone’s using ChatGPT to review contracts. Marketing is pushing out AI-generated campaigns. IT just rolled out a few “AI-powered” tools without looping anyone in. Meanwhile, the rules you’re trying to follow seem to change every other month, and the AI governance advice out there? It doesn’t feel connected to the day-to-day realities of compliance work. It’s one thing to talk about risk in theory. It’s another to sit in front of an auditor and explain what went wrong.

We get it. It’s frustrating. That’s why we focus on creating practical frameworks you can actually use. No fluff, no endless theory; just tools that keep up with the speed of the tech. Because when someone’s asking tough questions, a good plan beats good intentions every time.

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)

  • Description: A voluntary framework developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to help organizations manage risks associated with AI systems. It emphasizes trustworthiness, fairness, and transparency in AI.

  • Official Site: NIST

  • AI RMF Playbook: NIST

  • NIST AI Resource Center: NIST AI Resource CenterNIST AI Resource Center

European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act)

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 – AI Management System Standard

  • Description: ISO/IEC 42001 is the world’s first AI management system standard, providing requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an AI management system.

  • ISO Official Page: ISO

  • ISO AI Management Systems Overview: ISO

OECD AI Principles

  • Description: The OECD AI Principles promote the use of AI that is innovative and trustworthy and that respects human rights and democratic values. They serve as the first intergovernmental standard on AI.

  • Overview: OECD.AI

  • OECD AI Policy Observatory: OECD.AI

  • Implementation Report: OECD

IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems

  • Description: This initiative by IEEE provides guidelines and standards to ensure ethical considerations are integrated into the design and development of autonomous and intelligent systems.

  • Initiative Overview: IEEE Standards Association

  • Ethically Aligned Design Document: IEEE Standards Association

IT Leaders & Data Scientist

Your employees are already using AI tools you don’t know about. They’re feeding company data into ChatGPT, running models through third-party APIs, and building “quick experiments” that somehow ended up in production. Meanwhile, you’re getting blamed when AI systems mysteriously start performing worse, and compliance is asking for explanations about models you didn’t even know existed. The last thing you need is more governance overhead that slows down legitimate AI work. You need technical solutions that give you visibility into what’s actually running, monitoring that catches problems before users notice, and frameworks that help your data scientists build more reliable systems without drowning in paperwork. This isn’t about committee meetings or risk assessments. It’s about tools and processes that make your AI infrastructure more observable, more reliable, and more secure without making your team’s job harder.

Legal & Risk Teams

When your AI system makes a discriminatory hiring decision, who gets sued?

The CEO who approved the project? The data scientist who built the model? The vendor who provided the algorithm? The honest answer is probably all of them, and good luck explaining to a jury how a neural network reached its conclusion. Legal precedent for AI liability is practically nonexistent, insurance carriers are still figuring out what they’ll actually cover, and your existing risk frameworks weren’t designed for systems that learn and change after deployment. Meanwhile, every department wants to deploy AI faster, and they’re asking you questions you can’t answer with confidence. You need more than generic “AI ethics policies” written by consultants who’ve never defended an AI-related lawsuit. You need practical frameworks for documenting decisions, clear accountability structures that will hold up in court, and risk management approaches that translate AI technical concepts into language that judges, regulators, and insurance adjusters actually understand.

Latest AI Governance Insights

Staying on top of the latest AI developments can feel overwhelming with so much happening across platforms like OpenAI, MIT Technology Review, and arXiv. That’s why we’ve created an automated feed that pulls together relevant updates and delivers them straight to your AI governance hub, saving you from jumping between multiple sites.

Having this information right next to your governance frameworks and implementation guides creates a centralized resource for strategic planning and staying current with the evolving AI landscape. It’s like having a compass that helps you navigate AI complexities while keeping everything in context with your governance work.

AI Governance Resource Hub

Visit our Template Market Place: Documentation Template Marketplace
The market place will house templates for:

  1. Policies
  2. Procedures
  3. Evaluations
  4. Assesments
  5. Checklist
Visit the TJS Documentation Market Place
AI Governance Charter Template scaled
AI Governance Charter
AI Acceptable Use Policy
AI Acceptable Use Policy
AI Risk Management and Governance Framework pg 1
AI Risk Management and Governance Framework